Wij zijn met velen – zij zijn met weinigen

Wij zijn met velen – zij zijn met weinigen. Het is tijd om massaal te gaan opstaan!

–

In deze wereld kun je zomaar ineens een social media ban te pakken hebben. Op Facebook bijvoorbeeld, of Twitter. Belangrijk dus om te weten hoe en via welke social media je ons kunt volgen!

Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/hetanderenieuwsnl

Facebook zusterpagina : https://www.facebook.com/wijzijnhetSpuugzat

Signal: https://signal.group/#CjQKIM1nl2X7j2IR14jVOIoymzMQ7MhrTepl1tHa6sY9iGAeEhAtOxM8SH-WeeuU430-wvSe

Natuurlijk via www.hetanderenieuws.nl

En via het censuurvrije Vriendenplek.nl https://vriendenplek.nl/HetAndereNieuws
Hier kun je in vrijheid reageren en communiceren!

Wil je ook een social media waar je zonder censuur en advertenties gewoon plezier kunt maken en over alles kunnen spreken? Meld je dan aan bij VriendenPlek, de plek voor iedereen! https://vriendenplek.nl/

Wil je als organisatie, website of als vrije journalist ook deel uitmaken van het tegengeluid? Sluit je aan bij de Vereniging voor Vrije Journalisten. Meer dan 60 vrije media gingen je al voor. Meld je aan! https://vvj.nu/

(Visited 973 times, 1 visits today)

To the editors of …
MY DIStrust OF THE ‘NEW MEDIA’ IS GROWING BY THE DAY
I research which media are for and which are against abortion.
To my question to various news platforms of ‘Het Andere Nieuws’ whether they are for or against abortion, I received only one answer so far, namely from BLCKBX.
I quote from this: “The editors’ or ‘blckbx’ as an entity have no political position” and “In the context of abortion, we do not have a position that we propagate.
The personal opinion of all team members will probably even differ.
And as far as we’re concerned, everyone’s opinion can and should be there” and “I’m surprised you want to pigeonhole us.
In your words: we are either for or against. And if we don’t answer your question, you put us in a box.
If we do answer your question, you put us in a box. Right or wrong.
This makes it seem that you are doing the same as our government; you are for or against the measures, compulsory vaccination. farmers, nitrogen policy, etcetera.
And that creates dichotomy in our society and with that we maintain what can destroy us.
Divide and conquer. And that’s exactly what we’re trying to break through.”

Where do I know that from, place in boxes?
The boxes in question are YES or NO and if there is no answer I fill in ‘THE ONE SHOULD NOT KNOW’.
For the same money I would have entered NO OPINION. It doesn’t really matter.
The answer from ‘BLCKBX’ with accusations of creating dichotomy, preserving what can destroy us, divide and conquer. is downright outrageous and cowardly.
None of these news platforms have the audacity to take a stance on abortion.
Because they have to grow. They will not take a position until there is a clear global trend anti-abortion and possibly even pro.
https://hetanderenieuws.nl/de-machtspiramide-deel-2-machtige-media-nederlands-ondertiteld/
In the THE PYRAMID OF POWER PART 2 in the back of the second half, the following is said:
Another mainstream reporter who became independent is Ben Swann, a former news host at CBS Atlanta, who left for censoring his coverage.
Recently I spoke to Ben about his view on the failings of mainstream media INCLUDING THE IDEA THAT JOURNALISTS DON’T HAVE MANY.
Ben: “The idea that journalists don’t have their own opinion is absolutely wrong. And that’s clear. It’s human nature. Everyone has an opinion about everything.
It’s a misleading concept long advocated by companies like CNN. Glenn Greenwald calls it ’the gaze into nothingness’.
I am the subjective journalist I have no opinion, I know nothing, I only report what I see.” (Perhaps he meant the objective journalist here. This is clear from the context)
But that’s a robot, not a person. A fairer way to deal with it is to say “I have an opinion I’m honest about it, I’m free, libertarian in views, I believe in individual freedom and liberties, I’m honest about that, SO YOU KNOW WHERE I STAND.”
However, it is not important whether you have an opinion, you take the facts of your story and you turn them to fit your opinion, to fit your established starting point.
THAT’S NOT WHAT WE DO AS JOURNALISTS. We’ll see where the facts lead us, but OF COURSE WE HAVE AN OPINION ON IT.
No, news does not have to be neutral. In fact, NEWS CANNOT BE NEUTRAL.
As a JOURNALIST or NEWS EDITOR, you ALWAYS view news WITH A PARTICULAR GLASSES.
Now I would like to kindly ask you to answer the question by e-mail: Is your editorial team FOR OR AGAINST ABORTION?

4 thoughts on “Wij zijn met velen – zij zijn met weinigen”

A. Beimers schreef:

25 juli 2022 om 13:09

Absoluut mee eens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Guus Velraeds schreef:

25 juli 2022 om 17:14

Op Sri Lanka zijn ze er tot nu weinig mee opgeschoten. De ene WEF pupet vervangen door de volgende WEF puppet.
Anatole Sala schreef:

26 juli 2022 om 16:31

To the editors of …
MY DIStrust OF THE ‘NEW MEDIA’ IS GROWING BY THE DAY
I research which media are for and which are against abortion.
To my question to various news platforms of ‘Het Andere Nieuws’ whether they are for or against abortion, I received only one answer so far, namely from BLCKBX.
I quote from this: “The editors’ or ‘blckbx’ as an entity have no political position” and “In the context of abortion, we do not have a position that we propagate.
The personal opinion of all team members will probably even differ.
And as far as we’re concerned, everyone’s opinion can and should be there” and “I’m surprised you want to pigeonhole us.
In your words: we are either for or against. And if we don’t answer your question, you put us in a box.
If we do answer your question, you put us in a box. Right or wrong.
This makes it seem that you are doing the same as our government; you are for or against the measures, compulsory vaccination. farmers, nitrogen policy, etcetera.
And that creates dichotomy in our society and with that we maintain what can destroy us.
Divide and conquer. And that’s exactly what we’re trying to break through.”

Where do I know that from, place in boxes?
The boxes in question are YES or NO and if there is no answer I fill in ‘THE ONE SHOULD NOT KNOW’.
For the same money I would have entered NO OPINION. It doesn’t really matter.
The answer from ‘BLCKBX’ with accusations of creating dichotomy, preserving what can destroy us, divide and conquer. is downright outrageous and cowardly.
None of these news platforms have the audacity to take a stance on abortion.
Because they have to grow. They will not take a position until there is a clear global trend anti-abortion and possibly even pro.
https://hetanderenieuws.nl/de-machtspiramide-deel-2-machtige-media-nederlands-ondertiteld/
In the THE PYRAMID OF POWER PART 2 in the back of the second half, the following is said:
Another mainstream reporter who became independent is Ben Swann, a former news host at CBS Atlanta, who left for censoring his coverage.
Recently I spoke to Ben about his view on the failings of mainstream media INCLUDING THE IDEA THAT JOURNALISTS DON’T HAVE MANY.
Ben: “The idea that journalists don’t have their own opinion is absolutely wrong. And that’s clear. It’s human nature. Everyone has an opinion about everything.
It’s a misleading concept long advocated by companies like CNN. Glenn Greenwald calls it ’the gaze into nothingness’.
I am the subjective journalist I have no opinion, I know nothing, I only report what I see.” (Perhaps he meant the objective journalist here. This is clear from the context)
But that’s a robot, not a person. A fairer way to deal with it is to say “I have an opinion I’m honest about it, I’m free, libertarian in views, I believe in individual freedom and liberties, I’m honest about that, SO YOU KNOW WHERE I STAND.”
However, it is not important whether you have an opinion, you take the facts of your story and you turn them to fit your opinion, to fit your established starting point.
THAT’S NOT WHAT WE DO AS JOURNALISTS. We’ll see where the facts lead us, but OF COURSE WE HAVE AN OPINION ON IT.
No, news does not have to be neutral. In fact, NEWS CANNOT BE NEUTRAL.
As a JOURNALIST or NEWS EDITOR, you ALWAYS view news WITH A PARTICULAR GLASSES.
Now I would like to kindly ask you to answer the question by e-mail: Is your editorial team FOR OR AGAINST ABORTION?
ing. J. Onno Dekker schreef:

27 juli 2022 om 22:08

Bij OCCAM zijn er schattingen gemaakt van het aantal uit te schakelen weffers bij een contracoup.
Aanvankelijke schatting is bijgesteld. Circa 25000 criminelen werken in NL aan democide
en daarbij zijn niet eens de functionarissen bij justitie geteld. Dat betekent meer dan het echte aantal
verzetsmensen in WO II.
Als exercitie zijn strafmaten bepaald voor de toplandverraders en genocideplegers als Kuipers, Kaag en
Rutte. Daarbij komt men tot een schrikbarend aantal levenslang (omgezette doodstraf) en dat betekent
na een bijltjesdag het bouwen van een aantal zwaarbewaakte gevangenissen. Vergelijkingen met de Fuellmich
cijfers leert dat Nederland een gidsland is bij het WEF inzake massale uitroeiing door vaccinatie, uithongering
en de te verwachten werkkampen.

Wij zijn met velen – zij zijn met weinigen

More On demonstratie

4 thoughts on “Wij zijn met velen – zij zijn met weinigen”

Geef een reactie